Monday, 24 February 2014

Lecture 17

An important special case of Theorem 17.1 is when Y=aX, for some constant a.
The p.d.f. of Y is then fY(y)=(1/a)fX(y/a).

There are many ways to define transitive ordering relations between random variables. Now you know about EXEY and  EXstEY. Such relationships are important in applications, such as when X and Y are lifetimes of components and we are interested ordering their reliabilities. (Reliability engineering is concerned with determining the ability of a system or component to function under some stated conditions for a specified period of time.)

There are other ordering relations, such as "hazard rate ordering", and "convex ordering". These are described within the Wikipedia article on stochastic ordering. An important order relation in statistics is "likelihood ratio ordering". If X and Y have p.d.fs f and g such that f(t)/g(t) increases with t then XlrY. It is a stronger ordering than the two we have met, since XlrYXstY.

The treatment of the inspection paradox is this lecture derived from a paper by Sheldon Ross, The inspection paradox, Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 17, 2003, 47–51. Of course the use of the word "paradox" is somewhat in appropriate, since it is not hard to understand why XJstX1.

There are other such inspection paradoxes. Suppose X1,X2, are i.i.d. U[0,1] and N is the least integer such that X1++XN1. Then conditional on this,

XNstXN1ststX1.

I decided not to discuss it in the lecture, but at the end of page 69 of today's notes is the puzzle, "Do girls have more brothers than boys do?" The "proof" that the answer is "yes" is false, though initially it looks almost convincing. What is wrong?

What do you think is the truth of the matter? Let G and B be the mean number of brothers possessed by a typical girl and typical boy, respectively.

If every family were to consists of some number of boys and just one girl then G>B.

If every family were to consists of only boys or only girls then G<B.

What are the minimal conditions under which G=B? Must you assume that each child is independently a boy or girl with probability 1/2?

Comments

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
There are no comments posted yet. Be the first one!

Post a new comment

Comments by